“清江四案”“白银案”之前后

锦屏本地苗族木商向政府状告外省木商使用冲铅银两假币的诉讼案件。收集到的两件状词,一是道光七年（1827）由李荣魁带头起诉到贵州布政使司批转黎平府的公文,又由黎平府作出处理公告;另件是光绪十三年（1887）姜名卿等向黎平府递交的状纸。两起案件相隔60年,因为假银泛滥、受害深重后才产生诉讼,政府行文禁止后,仍禁而不止,所以少数民族的木商、林农和从事木材运输的农民工,受假银之害至少在80年以上。但从外省木商之滥用假币,折射出清水江木业之兴旺。

"The Silver Case"of The Four Law Cases in Qingjiang

The local Miao lumber businessman in Jinping area sued to the government that the out-of-town lumber businessman used the lead false coin.There were two evidence have been collected,one is a document which indicted by LiRongkui and transferred to LiPing government to gave the public notice in AD1827;the other is handed over by JiangMing qing in AD1887.The two events are separated in time by 60 years.Because the false coin overflowed,after the heavy victimization appears litigation,it couldn’t stop though the government issued prohibition,so the ethnic minorities lumber businessman and the transporter were all suffered injury at least 80 years,the out-of-town lumber businessman used the false coin reflected that wood business was prosperous in QingShuijiang area.