| 中西历史比较的规范与理路 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孟广林.中西历史比较的规范与理路[J].史学月刊,2005,4(1):97-101. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孟广林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学,历史学系,北京,100872 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中西历史比较研究必须遵循科学的学术规范与理路。“个案”研究是比较考察的基础,只有将所要比较的历史现象都搞清楚,才能进行深入的比较。为了进行高起点的比较,还需全面地批判借鉴有价值的成果。此外,还必须辩证地去分析问题,以求探索历史现象真正的异同。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中西历史比较 学术规范 学术理路 |
| 文章编号： | 0583-0214(2005)01-0097-05 |
Researching Rules and Scholatic Logic in the Comparative Study of History Between China and the West |
| |
| MENG Guang-lin.Researching Rules and Scholatic Logic in the Comparative Study of History Between China and the West[J].Journal of Historical Science,2005,4(1):97-101. |
| |
| Authors: | MENG Guang-lin |
| |
| Abstract: | It is necessary to follow the scientific researching rules and scholastic logic in the comparative study of history between China and the West. Comparative study must be built on the foundation of case study, and only by understanding fully the historical facts to be compared can we make a profound comparative study. In order to make a high-grade comparison,we need to draw on these valuable achievements.Moreover, it is essential to analyse problems dialectically so as to find out those real similarities and differences of historical phenomena. |
| |
| Keywords: | comparative study of history between China and the West researching rule scholastic logic |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
