Understanding interdisciplinarity in its argumentative context: thought and rhetoric in the perception of academic practices |
| |
Authors: | Carlos Adrian Cuevas-Garcia |
| |
Institution: | 1. Munich Center for Technology in Society, Technische Universit?t München, München, Germanycarlos.cuevas@tum.de |
| |
Abstract: | ABSTRACTThe meaning and value of interdisciplinarity can be described in several, at times even contradictory, ways. Yet, little is known about how these play a role in individuals’ argumentation and everyday thinking. Drawing on Michael Billig’s rhetorical psychology, this paper explores how individuals draw on meanings, values, and connotations of interdisciplinarity to construct arguments and counter-arguments about this practice. This approach sheds light on the contradictions that surround interdisciplinarity, and thus on the rhetorical context in which its meaning is constituted. The value of rhetorical psychology for the study of interdisciplinarity is demonstrated through the analysis of the discourse of 27 interviews with researchers and administrators from a large British university. The analysis identifies 12 interpretative repertoires interviewees use to argue and to think about interdisciplinarity. Highlighting these repertoires and the contradictions between them is relevant for stimulating individuals’ reflexivity, critical thought, and decision-making regarding disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity. |
| |
Keywords: | Argumentation disciplines discourse analysis contradiction interdisciplinarity interpretative repertoires Michael Billig rhetoric |
|
|