| 论“孔子未作《春秋》”说的生成逻辑 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 顾涛.论“孔子未作《春秋》”说的生成逻辑[J].史学月刊,2010(3). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 顾涛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 清华大学历史系博士后流动站; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 面对两千多年以来"孔子作《春秋》"之成说,20世纪20年代以顾颉刚、钱玄同为首的疑古派力倡"孔子未作《春秋》"说,此说竟在近一个世纪内风靡学术界,至今仍不乏持论者。然而,内置于这一论点形成和推证整个历史过程的深层逻辑,实际上是一种"指向性历史构境",是由对史料的截断式去取或臆解误读造成的。这种构境已经超出了史学研究"适度的想象"的范围,带有明显的主观蓄意性;欲在理论上加固这一推理逻辑的尝试同样是不能成立的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 春秋学史 孔子作《春秋》 历史构境 疑古派 |
On the Generation Logic of the Doctrine of The Spring and Autumn Annals Not Amended by Confucius |
| |
| GU Tao.On the Generation Logic of the Doctrine of The Spring and Autumn Annals Not Amended by Confucius[J].Journal of Historical Science,2010(3). |
| |
| Authors: | GU Tao |
| |
| Institution: | GU Tao(History Department,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Facing the traditional doctrine of The Spring and Autumn Annals amended by Confucius for 2000 years,since 1920s,the Doubting Antiquity School headed by GU Jie-gang and QIAN Xuan-tong have put forward a new doctrine of not amended by Confucius,which has been popular in the academic circle for about one century.Till now there is no lack of people holding this viewpoint.However,the nature of the underlying logic of this theory is actually the directive property of representing history,which results from quotin... |
| |
| Keywords: | The Spring and Autumn Annals learning history The Spring and Autumn Annals amended by Confucius represent history the Doubting Antiquity School |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
