A Transformed Triangle: Court, Congress, and Presidency in Civil Rights |
| |
| Authors: | Stephen L Wasby |
| |
| Institution: | Stephen L. Wasby (Ph.D., Oregon) is a professor of political science at the State University of New York at Albany. He is the author of The Supreme Court in the FederalJudicial System (4th ed., 1993) and co-author of Desegregation from Brown to Alexander: An Exploration of Supreme Court Strategies (1977), as well as a number of articles on civil rights litigation by interest groups, which is one of his continuing major research interests. |
| |
| Abstract: | The relative permeability of the three elements of a triangle-the Supreme Court, Congress, and the president-to civil rights interest groups has varied over time. For almost two decades after World War II, the Supreme Court was the groups' preferred arena because Congress was resistant and presidents could thus do little or were hesitant to act. For a brief time in the mid-1960s the president and Congress became supportive of civil rights groups' claims while the Court also remained accessible. Starting in the late 1960s executive and legislative support for civil rights moderated, with presidential support declining significantly in the 1980s. When the Supreme Court adopted that latter stance, Congress became the body through which to protect civil rights by reversing the Court's decisions. In this examination of the "transformed triangle" in civil rights policymaking, we look at this change over time and at "flip-flops" in litigation as one administration changes the position espoused by its predecessor, and we also give some attention to the Supreme Court's response to congressional reversal of its rulings. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
