两种不同的学术史范式——梁启超、钱穆《中国近三百年学术史》之比较

梁启超和钱穆同名的《中国近三百年学术史》,代表着两种不同的学术史范式,在体例渊源、写作宗旨等方面都有很大的不同。本结合它们成书的时代背景,揭示近代学风的嬗变对两书的影响,深入探讨造成它们差异的原因,并以这两种学术史的写法为视角,附论近代学风的内在转型问题。

A Comparative study on the Two Academical History of China of the Last Three Hundred Years Written Separately by Liang Qi chao and Qian Mu

Liang Qichao and Qian Mu have ever wrote successively two works on the academical history of Qing dynasty with the same name "Academical History of China of the Last Three Hundred Years". The similarities and differences of these two works and their internal relations have been seldom discussed. This paper holds that both are actually two different academical history works, representing two different paradigms. and, they have great difference in such aspects as the origin of style, purpose of writing, etc. Combining with the historical background of their writing,the paper also reveals the stylistic evolution of acadenical study and its influence on them,thus,goes deep into the reasons of their differences,then,from this angle,makes an inquiry into the internal transformation of modern academy.