首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

防霉防腐剂的抗流失性及防霉效果的研究
引用本文:赵桂芳,孙延忠,马箐毓,刘秀英,陈允适. 防霉防腐剂的抗流失性及防霉效果的研究[J]. 文物保护与考古科学, 2006, 18(1): 1-3
作者姓名:赵桂芳  孙延忠  马箐毓  刘秀英  陈允适
作者单位:1. 中国文物研究所,北京,100029
2. 中国林业科学院木材研究所,北京,100091
摘    要:为筛选适合木质文物使用的防霉防腐剂,对ML 208、咪鲜胺、戊唑醇、MV OP-10 4种防霉防腐剂进行了抗流失性和抑菌效果的研究。结果表明,4种药剂表现出不同的抗流失性,其抗流失性顺序为ML 208>咪鲜胺>戊唑醇>MV OP-10;MV OP-10的抗流失性虽较差,但雨水冲刷后仍具有较好的防霉效果;ML 208的抗流失性虽较强,但对霉菌的抗菌效果较差。

关 键 词:防霉防腐剂  MV OP-10  ML208  戊唑醇  咪鲜胺  抗流失
文章编号:1005-1538(2006)01-0001-03
收稿时间:2005-02-04
修稿时间:2005-10-28

Preservatives:loss-resistance and mould prevention
ZHAO Gui-fang,SUN Yan-zhong,MA Qing-yu,LIU Xiu-ying,CHNG Yun-shi. Preservatives:loss-resistance and mould prevention[J]. Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology, 2006, 18(1): 1-3
Authors:ZHAO Gui-fang  SUN Yan-zhong  MA Qing-yu  LIU Xiu-ying  CHNG Yun-shi
Affiliation:1. China National Cultural Property, Beijing 100029, China ;2. The Wood Instittae, Science of Academy of China Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
Abstract:In selecting preservatives for wooden artifacts,tests were conducted on four preservatives;ML208,MV (OP-10,)prochloraz and tebuconazole.The results showed that each had different lossresistance.ML208 had the best result Prochloraz was better than Tebuconazole and MV (OP-10) was the worst.While the lossresistance of MV (OP-10) was poor,it retained high antiseptic ability after scouring by rainwater.Lossresistance of ML208 was strong but its prevention of mould was poor.
Keywords:Preservative  MV OP-10  ML-208  Prochloraz  Tebuconazole  Loss-resistance
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《文物保护与考古科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《文物保护与考古科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号