Principles in the pipeline: managing transatlantic values and interests in Central Asia |
| |
Authors: | ALEXANDER COOLEY |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Associate Professor of Political Science at Barnard College, Columbia University and a Faculty Member of Columbia's Harriman Institute.;2. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the German Marshall Fund's Transatlantic Center, Brussels;3. the PONARS Eurasia Strategy Workshop in Tbilisi;4. and the American Political Science Association's Annual Meeting in Boston. The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts provided by Mark Beissinger, Valerie Bunce, Larry Diamond, Eric McGlinchey, Edward Schatz, Celeste Wallander, Thomas Wood and the anonymous referees. |
| |
Abstract: | After a decade of relative neglect post‐Soviet Central Asia has become a foreign policy priority for the transatlantic community. Both the United States and Europe have engaged with the region in recent years in pursuit of new strategic interests, including maintaining military basing access in support of coalition operations in Afghanistan and securing the export of Central Asian oil and gas to the West. Despite this period of renewed engagement, however, the quality of democratic governance within the region remains poor, especially in comparison with other post‐communist regions that successfully completed their political transitions. In fact, the United States and the European Union have often tempered promoting their Central Asian democratization agendas in order to maintain access to these strategically important fixed assets. The transatlantic struggle to balance the pursuit of strategic interests and democratic values has been rendered more difficult by Russia's recent resurgence as a regional power. Backed by the Central Asian governments, Moscow has challenged the purpose and influence of western‐based international and non‐governmental organizations in the region, thereby further diminishing the transatlantic community's capacity to promote sustained democratic reforms. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|