基于资本与场域理论的徽州地名变迁的社会响应与内在机理研究

立足社会大转型语境，收集有关徽州建制与地名变更争议的网络素材，借鉴批判范式、结合场域与社会记忆理论、采用语义网络分析对徽州地名变迁的社会响应与内在机理进行阐释。发现：社会响应存在明显的社群差异。婺源第一次改隶时民间强烈反抗并起到效果，第二次改隶后为多数民众所认可。媒体人群体、专家学者、普通民众与地方政府对徽州更名与复名的看法不尽相同，语义网络结构差异显著，关注重点亦有所不同。政治权力、经济资本与社会记忆分别推动徽州地名场域的边界重构、式微让步及其与黄山地名场域的交融共存是徽州地名变迁的内在机理。

STUDY ON THE SOCIAL RESPONSE AND INTRINSIC MECHANISM OF HUIZHOU PLACE-NAME BASED ON THE CAPITAL AND FIELD THEORY

Since the 1980s, toponymy studies in the Western societies has shifted away from traditional to critical paradigm. Critical toponymy holds that toponyms take active part in creating place and in building identity by implanting cultural-political connotations and power relations into neutral physical spaces. But Chinese scholars always consider toponyms only as transparent signifiers that designate places as objects or artifacts within a predefined geographical space has paid little attention to this turning. The intrinsic trait of a place-name make it disputed, thus the critical paradigm attaches more importance to insight on cultural, economic, ethnic and political conflicts of naming practices. As to the critical toponymy, human geographers have made great contribution to examine the motivation, contradiction and identification involved in place naming or renaming and to the advance in critical social theory. Based on the context of social transformation, by collecting the website material about the discussion on the changes in administrative division and place name of Huizhou, by using the critical paradigm for reference and combing the theory of field and social memory, this pepper adopt the text analysis to explore the social responses and driving force to the changes in place-name of Huizhou. It found a great difference existing in social responses to the changes. At the first time of belonging to Jiangxi Province, the common people in Wuyuan County vigorously resisted the policymakers and succeed finally, at the second time, they accepted gradually the reality. The media, scholar, civilian and official have different opinions and focuses about the renaming and recovering of Huizhou place-name and each of their semantic network has a pattern of its own. The intrinsic mechanism of toponymic changes of Huizhou can be explained as next, political rights, economic capital and social memory respectively reconstructed the field boundary of Huizhou place-name, weakened the field strength of Huizhou place-name, and gave away to and merged with the field of Huangshan place name separately.