Diplomacy in a Global Early Modernity: The Ambiguity of Sovereignty |
| |
Authors: | André J. Krischer Hillard von Thiessen |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Historisches Seminar der WWU, Geschichte Gro?britanniens, Domplatz 20-22, D-48143, Münster, Germany;2. krischer@uni-muenster.de;4. Lehrstuhl für die Geschichte der Frühen Neuzeit, Universit?t Rostock, Neuer Markt 3, D-18055, Rostock, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | AbstractThis is a concluding comment on the chapters of this special issue. After a discussion of the articles, we will take a closer look at the new view of European diplomacy and foreign relations. The historiographical change regarding early modern foreign relations has fundamentally altered the way we interpret the roles, the agencies and the loyalties of early modern envoys. Taking the conclusions of this research into account, we ask if diplomatic actors of the ancient regime differed distinctly from their Asian counterparts at all. Then, as a final point, we examine how fundamental changes in the Sattelzeit–particularly in Europe, but also in the context of global power relations–affected intercultural diplomacy. |
| |
Keywords: | Intercultural diplomacy early modern history global history diplomatic ceremonial Sattelzeit |
|
|