首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

两张英藏晚清广州洪兵舆图成图时间再考——兼及舆图成图时间考证的“断限逼近法”
引用本文:郑永华.两张英藏晚清广州洪兵舆图成图时间再考——兼及舆图成图时间考证的“断限逼近法”[J].历史地理研究,2020,40(2):150-155.
作者姓名:郑永华
作者单位:北京市社会科学院历史所,北京 100101
基金项目:北京市社会科学基金重大项目“流散欧洲舆图与晚清史事研究”(17ZDA09)
摘    要:成图时间考证是传统舆图研究中最初步最重要的工作,本文利用“断限逼近法”重新考察两幅清代广州洪兵舆图的成图时间。通过对新发掘档案的梳理,判断将F.O.931/1079图的成图前限推至咸丰四年六月二十四日的结论尚不成立,而F.O.931/1892图的成图断限则可由原来的八月三十日至九月初五日进一步推断为九月十一日至十二日。

收稿时间:2019-08-02

A Revisit on the Drawing Time of Two Hongbing Military Maps of Canton During the Taiping Rebellion,Now Held in the National Archive,U.K. Based on the “Approaching from Both Termini” Method
Zheng Yonghua.A Revisit on the Drawing Time of Two Hongbing Military Maps of Canton During the Taiping Rebellion,Now Held in the National Archive,U.K. Based on the “Approaching from Both Termini” Method[J].The Chinese Historical Geography,2020,40(2):150-155.
Authors:Zheng Yonghua
Institution:Institute of History, Beijing Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Abstract:Determining the drawing time of traditional maps is an important and fundamental task. Based on the “approaching from both termini” method, and literature and archive review, this paper offers a revisit on the drawing time of two Hongbing (Hong army) military maps of Canton during the Taiping Rebellion, which are now held in the National Archive, U.K. It cannot be clearly proved if the first map (F.O.931/1079) drew on July 18, 1854, whereas the drawing time of second map (F.O.931/1892) can be determined on November 1-2 of the same year, from the period of October 21-26.
Keywords:military maps of Canton  drawing time  late Qing Dynasty  Hongbing  “approaching from both termini”  
点击此处可从《历史地理研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《历史地理研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号