论哈维对海德格尔“地方”思想的一次学术建构

大卫·哈维在收录于其《正义、自然与差异地理学》文集中的《从空间到地方,再回看》这篇文章中,对他所谓的马丁·海德格尔"地方建构"思想进行了批判。通过忠实地引用哈维和海德格尔的著作、分析其各自观点形成的背景并提供依据,本文详尽揭示了哈维在勾勒海德格尔思想这一学术工作中的操作细节,即他实际上大量使用了重排引文、重组素材、偷换主题、"视而不见"、模糊处理等做法,"制造"出一个需要批判的所谓海德格尔的"地方建构"思想,从而对自己所要提出的"地方建构"思想加以支持。仅就目前所掌握的文献看,海德格尔有他自己的"地方"和"空间"思想,但并未明确讨论过甚至从没有提到过哈维所关心的"地方建构"问题。

ON DAVID HARVEY'S ACADEMIC CONSTRUCTION OF MARTIN HEIDEGGER'S THOUGHTS ON “PLACE”

In his "From space to place, and back again", an article reprinted in Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference in 1996, David Harvey tried to academically construct Martin Heidegger's thought of the "place construction" process. Harvey employed several techniques of text construction such as recomposing the citations, reconstructing the materials selectively, replacing the topic, ignoring the obvious, and expressing ambiguously. This article explicates the details of his academic construction in a deconstruction way, by pointing out that, Harvey's hurry of construction of his own viewpoint led to his forgetting of the rigorous and credible bottom line for academic research. By pointing out Heidegger's importance to the space studies, Harvey brought this thinker's thought up again and set a new basis for future research. However, Harvey didn't treat Heidegger's thought on space very carefully. By leading the meaning of "recovery of dwelling" to "place construction", Harvey intentionally overemphasized the significance of "place" in Heidegger's thought and paradoxically supported his own thought on place construction. If we do not probe and clarify the optional elaboration and intended construction of Heidegger's thoughts on space and place, their enlightenment and contribution to related research of human geography will be severely hampered. In conclusion, in order to righteously make of the meditative thoughts of space and place provided by Heidegger and other philosophers, especially the phenomenologists, human geographers should ensure the prerequisite that they will respect the original works and try their best to avoid misreading before any application or criticism.