说黄宗羲《明儒学案》晚年定本

清康熙三十年前后 ,《明儒学案》出现了两种有重大差别的版本 ,即郑性刻本(简称“郑本”)和贾润、贾朴父子刻本 (简称“贾本”)。道光初年 ,又出现了调和郑、贾二本的莫晋刻本 (简称“莫本”)。《明儒学案》的三种不同版本系统由此形成。过去 ,学术界普遍认为郑本是众本所出的善本。本文通过对郑、贾二本次序、案题、内容等方面的详细比较分析 ,证明郑本乃作者初稿 ,贾本各方面均优于郑本 ,应是郑本的修订本 ,亦即黄宗羲的晚年定本 ,于现存诸本中为最善。今天使用《明儒学案》 ,应以贾本为准。莫本正确地采用了贾本的内容 ,但次序、案题从郑本则未妥

The Authorized Version of MINGRU XUEAN in Huang Zongxi's Late Years

There appeared two different editions of Ming Ru Xue An (namely the Confucian Academic History of the Ming Dynasty) around the 30th year of Kangxi period in Qing Dynasty (1691),one compiled by Zheng Xing and the other by Jia Run and his son Jia Pu.In the 1st year of Daoguang (1821),a man named Mo Jin compiled the book by synthesizing the above|mentioned editions.The edition by Zheng Xing has long been regarded as the best of the three,while this article,through careful comparison and analysis of the sequences,titles and contents between the Zheng and the Jia editions,proves that the latter is better than the former in almost every aspect,therefore,holds that Jia's should be the revised edition of the Zheng edition,namely the definitive edition written by Huang Zongxi in his old age which is the best one among the three.Though the Mo's edition also employed the contents of the Jia edition,it followed the Zheng's in the arrangement of the sequence and titles,so it can not be taken as authority.