首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

《长安志》对《水经注》“交水”条的割裂与曲解
引用本文:辛玉璞.《长安志》对《水经注》“交水”条的割裂与曲解[J].中国历史地理论丛,2001,16(3):19-21.
作者姓名:辛玉璞
作者单位:中共西安市委党校文史教研室,西安,710054
摘    要:水一支穿过神禾原人工河道与御宿川大河 (唐称福水 ,后称氵高水 )交汇 ,称交水 ,西入沣。古本《水经注》如此记载 ,今本《水经注》无。《长安志》引《水经注》时 ,将二水交汇为交水句与交水段割裂 ,作为福水源头 ,曰“福水即交水也”,曲解了《水经注》的原义 ,在学术上造成混乱。后世以氵高水为交水者 ,其源盖出于此

关 键 词:《长安志》交水观  割裂与曲解  《水经注》原义

How Changan Annals Isolated and Misrepresented Jiao River Entry of Shuijing Annotation
Abstract:A branch of Ju River cross man- made canal of Shen He Highland,congverge into Yu Su Plain River (Fu River in Tang Dynastry,and Hao River afterwards) ,flows west into Feng River.Jiao Riveris the section which following the cross.That's how the lostedition " Shuijing Annotation" stand.While the edition that we use usually has none word aboutit.As " Changan Annals" quoted " Shuijing Annotation" ,it isolated two river cross and shaped Jiao River with whole pasage,misrepresented the original meaning of" Shuijing Annotation" ,consdered Fu River as Jiao River.Thus made confusion in sphere of learning.As aruslt,later scholar offen regard Hao River as Jiao River
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号