Temporal Patterns and Effects of Surface‐Water Diversions on Daily Flows and Aquatic Habitats: Bega‐Bemboka River,New South Wales,Australia

An understanding of the nature and magnitude of hydrological, physical habitat and physico‐chemical effects resulting from surface‐water diversions in river systems is essential for effective management of water resources. For most coastal‐draining rivers in New South Wales, however, there are few data available on irrigation diversions, their hydrological impacts and environmental effects. This paper therefore presents an analysis of mean daily surface‐water diversions for pasture irrigation from approximately three years of metered data and the resultant effects on daily flows and aquatic habitats in the Bega‐Bemboka River. The period of analysis of the hydrological effects of irrigation diversions is extended to the full length of record (approximately five years) for gauging stations most affected by irrigation diversions, using Maintenance of Variance Extension Type 1 (MOVE.1) modelling techniques. The annual mean, median and peak daily rates of water diversion by metered surface‐water licences used to irrigate 925 ha of dairy pasture are 10.5 Ml d^?1, 7.3 Ml d^?1 and 41.5 Ml d^?1, respectively. Diversion effects on flow duration statistics are such that the measured 90th and 95th daily flow duration percentiles at the gauging station most affected by upstream irrigation diversions are equivalent to the 97th and 99th flow duration percentiles, respectively, under MOVE.1 modelled natural flow conditions. While diversions for irrigation over the three‐year data period account for only 6.6% of total flow volumes, diversions as a proportion of daily surface‐water inflows increase exponentially under decreasing flow rates. Median and maximum daily diversion rates attain 91% and 118%, respectively, of total surface‐water inflows to the diversion‐affected reach when upstream inflows range from 15 to 20 Ml d^?1. This exponentially‐increasing relationship between daily diversion rates and declining surface‐water inflows suggests that ‘rule of thumb’ guidelines on sustainable diversion limits based on mean or median annual percentage diversion volumes need to be applied cautiously to river systems with no or limited capacity to manipulate flows to meet downstream consumptive demands.