首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


The geography of community and political organisation in London today
Authors:Jane Wills
Institution:1. UCL Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK;2. UCL Department of Mathematics, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK;3. School of Government and Public Policy, University of Arizona, 315 Social Science Bldg, P.O. Box 210027, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA;1. Department of Geography, Northumbria University, UK;2. Department of Social Sciences, University of Sunderland, UK;1. School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, 5th Floor Claremont Tower, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK;2. GPO Box 12293, Kathmandu, Nepal
Abstract:Set in the context of growing concern about the lack of a coherent political response to the economic crisis, and in the aftermath of devastating urban violence in English cities, this paper highlights the pressing need for new forms of political organisation in countries like the UK. The paper focuses on the remarkable growth and prominence of community organising in the UK. The largest community alliance, called London Citizens, now commands significant support and influence in the capital and is attracting attention from politicians, journalists and commentators from across the UK. The rising profile of community organising flies in the face of much scholarship in the social sciences which has long declared the death of geographical community – and its socio-political significance – in the modern metropolis. The paper provides an overview of this literature and highlights the particular importance of population turnover, increased diversity and stretched social networks. In this context, the paper then explores how London Citizens has been able to use a particular geographical architecture to work with and against these challenges. The paper argues that London Citizens’ territorial but institutionally networked structure is particularly important to its growth and impact. This model of politics locates institutional islands of social solidarity and forges connections between them, creating a new community that is able to mitigate some of the effects of population turnover and stretched social networks in the city-at-large. The paper highlights the strengths and weaknesses of this geo-political architecture, drawing attention to the importance of institutional affiliation, identity-making, the reproduction of collective memory, and the issue of funding.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号