首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Blair's wars and Brown's budgets: from Strategic Defence Review to strategic decay in less than a decade
Authors:PAUL CORNISH  ANDREW DORMAN
Institution:Holds the Carrington Chair in International Security and is Head of the International Security Programme at Chatham House.;Associate Fellow at Chatham House and a Senior Lecturer in the Defence Studies Department, King's College London based at the United Kingdom's Joint Services Command and Staff College.
Abstract:The Labour government's 1998 Strategic Defence Review (SDR) marked the end of almost twenty years during which Labour had been little more than a bystander in British defence policy-making. The 'foreign policy-led' SDR marked an impressive and authoritative debut, emulated by other national governments. Ten years later, however, the SDR is a fading memory. British defence is out of balance and facing immense stress, and calls are mounting for a new strategic defence review. This article examines the difficult choices which a defence review would have to make. But a defence review also requires the governmental machinery with which to analyse and understand defence, and with which those difficult choices can be made. The article argues that this machinery is wearing out. Defence policy, planning and analysis in the United Kingdom have reached a state of organizational, bureaucratic and intellectual decay which may be irrecoverable.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号