首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Flexibility or exploitation? Corporate social responsibility and the perils of universalization (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)
Authors:Jessica Smith  Frederico Helfgott
Institution:1. National Endowment for the Humanities fellowship at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Her research addresses gender and kinship in Wyoming coal‐mining families. Her email is Jessica.Mary.Smith@colorado.edu.;2. PhD candidate in the Doctoral Program in Anthropology and History at the University of Michigan. He is currently doing field and archival research for his dissertation on transformations in labour and community relations in Peru's mines. His email is federimi@umich.edu.
Abstract:As anthropologists and other critics of capitalism turn their attention to the controversial and burgeoning corporate social responsibility (CSR) movement, most focus on conflicts in community relations and environmental degradation. Few scholars have examined equally pertinent questions of labor restructuring, even though these transformations emerged at about the same time as the rise of CSR. In this article, we draw on research in two Peruvian mining communities to explore the potential contradiction between the simultaneous mandate for corporations to present themselves as responsible employers, on the one hand, and the drive to rationalize labor and reduce financial responsibility for the workforce, on the other. We suggest that for both corporate officials and some scholars, this tension remains a latent one because CSR discourses and documents generalize corporate interests as the interests of mines as a whole.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号