Worldwide cross-cultural studies and their relevance for archaeology |
| |
Authors: | Melvin Ember Carol R Ember |
| |
Institution: | (1) Human Relations Area Files, Yale Station, P.O. Box 2054, 06520-2054 New Haven, Connecticut;(2) Department of Anthropology, Hunter College, CUNY, 695 Park Avenue, 10021 New York, New York |
| |
Abstract: | Archaeological inference based on ethnographic analogy may or may not be correct. What is worse, there is no systematic way to tell. With certain provisos, it is better to generate archaeological inference from the results of worldwide cross-cultural tests of relational hypotheses. Such tests may provide more benefits than within-region comparisons. This paper discusses a number of ways in which worldwide cross-cultural research may be used in archaeological inference, including: generalizing about societal types, inferring from presumed causes, inferring from material correlates, and inferring from noncausal associations. The paper concludes with a discussion of how comparative archaeology could help cross-cultural researchers test causal theories diachronically. |
| |
Keywords: | inference archaeology cross-cultural indicators |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|