Radiocarbon dating: Some practical considerations for the archaeologist

The article is divided into four main sections in each of which a key aspect of radio-carbon dating is discussed with emphasis on the practical implications for users of dates. The four topics which the article attempts to deal with are, in turn, (i) the effect on the radiocarbon timescale of the variations in atmospheric ¹⁴C now known to have occurred in the past and the role of other absorlute dating methods in investigating these, (ii) laboratory measurement of ¹⁴C, (iii) selection of optimum samples for dating and (iv) some of the limitations of the final dates. The theme is essentially that the technical difficulties of radiocarbon measurement in the laboratory have been overcome to the extent that the physical measurements can now be made with high precision, that is to within ±1% or better, as a routine. Thus, it is more important than ever (a) that only reliable samples having very firm associations should be dated and (b) that pretreatment of such samples by the dating laboratory to remove any age contaminants should be completely effective. However, in addition to the recognized statistical limitations, the absolute accuracy of radio-carbon dating is limited by the past ¹⁴C variations. Coupled with the requirements of proper association and pretreatment of samples is the long-term need to establish an overall correlation between radiocarbon and calendar years. At present this is still a matter for final agreement by the laboratories concerned. Meanwhile, when all possible steps have been taken to ensure the reliability of the date messurements, these can strictly only be compared with one another in terms of radiocarbon years bp. In practice this is often too restrictive but any attempts at calibration must be regarded as approximations for the time being. In this article the lower and upper case notation advocated in Antiquity46, 265, for radiocarbon and calendar years respectively has been followed.