|
|||||
|
|
| 宋代纪传、编年二体优劣论 | |
| 引用本文： | 曹鹏程.宋代纪传、编年二体优劣论[J].史学史研究,2011(1). |
| 作者姓名： | 曹鹏程 |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学历史文化学院; |
| 摘 要： | 中唐以后的史家开始重视史学褒贬人事、惩恶劝善的宗旨,编年体史书由此中兴,历史上的二体优劣之争再起。及至北宋,孙甫强调编年体具有体正、文简的优点。体正,指编年体便于立褒贬以惩劝,同时起源较早,与儒家经典关系密切;文简则是指编年体史文简约。孙甫的观点得到宋代多数论者的响应。同时,宋代史学考察重心由人到事的转移,也对编年体史书占据史学主流地位推波助澜。以上因素最终导致了编年体史书空前繁荣的局面。 |
| 关 键 词： | 宋代史学 纪传体 编年体 二体 |
The Controversy of Which is Superior between Historiography in the Form of Biography and That of Chronicle in Song Dynasty |
|
| Cao Pengcheng.The Controversy of Which is Superior between Historiography in the Form of Biography and That of Chronicle in Song Dynasty[J].Journal of Historiography,2011(1). | |
| Authors: | Cao Pengcheng |
| Institution: | Cao Pengcheng |
| Abstract: | |
| Keywords: | Historiography in Song Dynasty Historiography in the form of biography Historiography in the form of chronicle The two types of historiography |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ | |