首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

也説《隋書》所記梁代印綬冠服制度的史源問題
引用本文:孫正軍. 也説《隋書》所記梁代印綬冠服制度的史源問題[J]. 中华文史论丛, 2011, 0(1): 135-160,400,401
作者姓名:孫正軍
作者单位:清華大學歷史學系;
基金项目:北京市優秀博士學位論文指導教師人文社科項目《中國古代官僚等級制新探》(YB20081000101)成果之一
摘    要:對於《隋書·禮儀志六》所記梁代印綬冠服制度的史料來源,日本學者小林聰先生提出,其基礎是梁武帝天監二年所頒佈的"天監二年令"。本文考察認爲,隋志記載並非本自梁令,而是以《宋書·禮志五》所記百官印綬冠服制度爲基礎,並補充西晉泰始令及其衍生著作,以及東晉以降至梁初的各種制度變革綜合而成。因此,隋志所記並不能如實反映梁代印綬冠服制度。由此指出,在利用史料之前,對文本進行史料批判是一項不可或缺的作業。

关 键 词:印綬冠服  隋志  宋志  天監二年令  泰始令

Historical Sources of the Codes of Sartorial Paraphernalia in the Liao Dynasty
Sun Zhengjun. Historical Sources of the Codes of Sartorial Paraphernalia in the Liao Dynasty[J]. Journal of Chinese Literature and History, 2011, 0(1): 135-160,400,401
Authors:Sun Zhengjun
Affiliation:Sun Zhengjun
Abstract:According to Japanese scholar Kobayashi Satoshi, the Codes of Sartorial Paraphernalia in the Liang, as recorded in the Chapter on Rituals in the History of Sui, came from the Codes in the Second Year of Tianjian Reign under Lianng Wu Emperor’s rule. In this paper I argue that the former Codes were derived from a different historical source. It was based on the records of sartorial paraphernalia for officials in the History of the Song and enriched with details from Taishi Codes in the Western Jin and other related works, as well as all sorts of sources from the Eastern Jin through the early Liang. Therefore, we cannot solely rely on the History of the Sui to reconstruct the Codes of Sartorial Paraphernalia in the Liang. This paper also aims to emphasize the significance of critical evaluations of historical sources.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号