同城化治理研究——以广佛地区为例

近年来,国家提出治理模式和治理体系现代化要求,其中,都市区治理作为重要组成部分,对其合理模式的研究成为城市管理领域的焦点。本文基于都市区治理理论,分析了中国都市区治理模式由强制性区划调整向城市协商合作的演变过程,认为同城化将成为未来区域治理的主要模式,是现代化治理模式的体现。进而提出以建立共识、渠道和激励为基础的同城化治理框架。在此基础上,以广佛同城化为例,采用实地调查和访谈等研究方法,通过对广佛行政管理体制差异的分析,认为管理层级架构的差异是影响广佛多层级治理效果的关键,发现建立"共识"是城市之间协调的核心,"渠道构建"和"激励机制"是同城化规划开展与实施的保障,以期为今后同城化规划提供借鉴。

RESEARCH ON THE GOVERNANCE OF CITY INTEGRATION: A CASE OF GUANGZHOU-FOSHAN

Recent decades, the profound revolution in transportation and communication technology has significantly extended the flow of production factors to a larger scale, thus restructuring the urban system in the global context. Specifically, the state's ability of controlling capital has continued to be transferred to global or supranational levels, and the production capacity and industrial competitiveness have continued to shift to local levels. In this context, it is increasingly impossible for the central government to effectively organize and coordinate productive activities.Based on the theory of metropolitan governance, this paper analyzes the trajectory of models of regional governance from the mandatory adjustment of administration to the negotiatory corporation between cities, thereby highlighting the increasing significance of the integrative development. From this point, urban integration, which can represent the characteristics of modern governance, will become the principle mode of regional governance in the future. This paper establishes a theoretical frame for integrative governance, which is constituted by three elements of consensus, channels and incentives. In the case of Guangzhou-Foshan regions, based on research methods of field trips and interviews, this paper discusses the differences of administrative systems between Guangzhou and Foshan, before claiming that the misplacement of management in different government levels has become the underling reason for the ineffectiveness of multi-level governance between Guangzhou and Foshan.