Why a resale royalty was rejected in Australia |
| |
Authors: | Victoria Till |
| |
Affiliation: | 25 Smith Street, Highgate, WA 6003, Australia E-mail: vtill@student.ecu.edu.au |
| |
Abstract: | In 2004 the Australian Opposition party introduced to Parliament a private member’s bill proposing the amendment of Australian copyright law to include an artist’s resale royalty. In response to the bill the Government released the Proposed Resale Royalty Arrangement Discussion Paper, which successfully provided a tangible foundation for discussions and stimulated the first strong academic debate regarding a resale royalty within Australia. Despite overwhelming support from respondents, in May 2006 the Government announced it would not support the adoption of a resale royalty right and the Resale Royalty Bill 2004 failed to pass through Parliament. The rejection of a resale royalty by the Australian Government illustrates the ongoing difficulty of incorporating civil law notions of creative rights, and moral rights in particular, into common law – particularly as the Australian Government’s approach to policy making is increasingly underpinned by economic rationalism. |
| |
Keywords: | Australia droit de suite economics Government policy resale royalty |
|
|