Stating space in modern Mexico |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil;2. GSI Brazil, Chapada dos Guimarães, MT, Brazil;3. EMBRAPA, Eastern Amazon, Belém, PA, Brazil;1. Center for Craniofacial Research, School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas;2. Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas;3. Department of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil;4. Department of Oral Biology, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;1. Department of Geography, University of California at Santa Barbara, USA;2. Institute for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research, University of California at Santa Barbara, USA;3. Department of Economics, University of California at Santa Barbara, USA;4. School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, USA;1. Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States;2. Linguistics and Cognitive Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, United States;3. Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States;1. Division of GI, Trauma, and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12636 East 17th Ave, Room 5401, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA;2. Trauma Services, University of Colorado Hospital, Mail Stop-F756, 12401 E 17th Ave Aurora, CO, 80045, USA;3. Department of Surgery, UC Health Memorial Hospital, 1400 E. Boulder Street, Suite 600, Colorado Springs, CO, 80909, USA;4. Department of Surgery, UC Health Medical Center of the Rockies, 2500 Rocky Mountain Avenue, Suite 2200 Loveland, CO, 80538, USA;5. Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, 700 Delaware St., Davis Pavilion, Pavilion D & E Denver, CO, 80204, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This paper critiques the largely Anglophone “New Cultural History” (NCH) written on post-revolutionary Mexico, calling for a more robust theoretical and methodological approach to the state than scholars have thus far employed. Earlier trends, each of course inflected with the politics of their times, remained fastened upon the purportedly unified force of Mexican officialdom. Revisionist narratives tended to abstract the state from social and cultural belief and practice. As such, scholars' grasp of social change was weakened by their failure to see politics, culture, and society as interrelated processes. Nevertheless, the closer examination of popular culture stressed by some contemporary historians—an undeniably important analytical tack—still does not obviate the need for a solid, at times even central, focus on processes of state-formation. Herein, I review some of the critical contributions to a growing multidisciplinary field of state/culture studies, and from critical human geography, and suggest ways their insights might be useful for historians and historical geographers focusing on the post-revolutionary Mexican state. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|