Compromised Landscapes: The Proto-Panoptic Politics of Colonial Araucanian and Spanish Parlamentos

Indigenous resistance to the Spanish Crown in the Araucania region of south-central Chile is infrequently included in wider discussions of early American colonialism. Until recently, what has been inadequately addressed in these discussions is the parlamentos (peace treaties) associated with Spanish efforts to seize territorial control of the region. In this paper, we highlight the potential of landscape analysis to enhance our archival and archaeological understanding of the long historical confrontation between the Araucanians and the Spanish from the sixteenth to eighteenth centuries. The Spanish were unable to defeat the indigenous populations living south of the Bio Bio River, the formal frontier established between the Crown and the Araucanians. However, they enacted numerous parlamentos in hope of establishing military footholds. Because the Spaniards failed to conquer the region, parlamentos eventually developed into compromised acts of observing and monitoring military movements and of recruiting allied indigenous groups. On the basis of this interdisciplinary examination, we argue that Spanish parlamentos were a ‘panopticon’-like network of political surveillance, designed to provide a visible signal of the wider political activities taking place beyond the formal frontier. The panopticon model provides a metaphorical and conceptual framework for conceiving this aspect of Spanish and Araucanian relations and for defining one cause of successful indigenous resiliency to external influence.