Joseph Levenson and the possibility for a dialogic history |
| |
Authors: | Madeleine Yue Dong Ping Zhang |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University of Washington, Seattle;2. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv |
| |
Abstract: | In contrast to the criticism that his work represents a Euro-centric view of China, we argue that Joseph Levenson’s understanding of China involves a third dimension – Judaism – at the level of his historical perspective and methodology. Built on in-depth analysis of Levenson’s work, in particular his Confucian China and Its Modern Fate, as well as his unfinished yet profound writings on Judaism and Jewish history, we find that his understanding of Jewish tradition plays a crucial role in his analysis of the history of modern China. We argue that what Levenson practiced was a historical methodology that we name “dialogic history.” We believe that dialogic history provides us a potential answer to the question of how we can understand another culture without being imperialists, essentialists, or Orientalists. Dialogic history is also history in action because when this kind of dialogue is conducted, a new space can be created in which history is no longer a one-sided monologue. |
| |
Keywords: | Joseph R. Levenson dialogic history Confucian China and Its Modern Fate tradition modernity comparative history Judaism |
|
|