首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Chiefs,hunters and adventurers: the foundation of the Okavango/Moremi National Park,Botswana
Institution:1. Christchurch Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, PO Box 4345, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand;2. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, ACCI Building, Addenbrooke''s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK;3. Cardiovascular Research Institute, National University Health Systems, Centre for Translational Medicine, Medical Drive, 117599, Singapore;4. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand;5. Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Unitec, Private Bag 92025, Auckland 1142, New Zealand;1. University of Johannesburg, Department of Social Work, PO Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa;2. University of Pretoria, Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Psychology, Groenkloof Campus, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
Abstract:This article is about the politics of wildlife management in Botswana. The existing literature on the origins of wildlife conservation in Africa has portrayed the formation of protected areas as an imposition of colonial state authorities. Preservationist policies are usually cast as the product of European conservationist ideas, and related notions of the ‘wilderness’ value of African landscapes. Many recent studies have emphasized the negative effects of such ideas and policies in a colonial context: they have drawn attention to the way in which they devalued local African ideas, undermined local management strategies, and criminalized access to important economic and cultural resources. The case discussed here, however, suggests that this interpretation needs closer scrutiny: the meaning and impact of global ideas and policies of wildlife conservation depends on how they are localized in particular places. The key actors in the foundation of Botswana's Okavango/Moremi National Park in the 1960s were not state officials but local BaTawana chiefs and a network of hunters and adventurers turned conservationists. The initiative was conceived as a means of protecting wildlife from the depredations of illegal South African hunting parties and ensuring future local use, and was initially opposed by the colonial state. The article discusses why Okavango/Moremi was an exception, and why the initial coalition of African and local settler interests came to see preservationist policies as being in their interest.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号