Promise and challenge of European Memory |
| |
Authors: | Friedemann Pestel Rieke Trimçev Gregor Feindt Félix Krawatzek |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Albert-Ludwigs-Universit?t Freiburg, Historisches Seminar, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germanyfriedemann.pestel@geschichte.uni-freiburg.de;3. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universit?t Greifswald, Institut für Politik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Greifswald, Germany;4. Department of History, Leibniz Institute of European History, Mainz, Germany;5. Department of Politics and International Relations, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, United Kingdom |
| |
Abstract: | AbstractThis introduction identifies the ubiquitous, but controversial, public and academic debate on European Memory as a key for articulating assumptions and expectations about an enhanced process of European integration via references to Europe’s past. The authors outline contradictions that constitute this discourse by pointing to its inherently conflictive potential and carve out the implicit and explicit normative assumptions of European Memory. Albeit acknowledging differences in memories of twentieth-century mass violence, references to European Memory promise to overcome the conflicts inherent in the historical experiences of such violence. Confronting this bias, this special issue postulates an understanding of European Memory as a discursive reality rather than a normative ideal. European Memory becomes manifest whenever actors refer to ‘Europe’ in their interpretations of the past. Further developing an understanding of ‘entangled memory’, the contributions of this special issue share a common interest in the universalizing potential of references to European Memory. They demonstrate how mnemonic practices may lose contextual references and link or even transfer to other memories in order to articulate claims of relevance on a European level. |
| |
Keywords: | European Memory entangled memory universalization European integration |
|
|