Palaeolithic dogs and the early domestication of the wolf: a reply to the comments of |
| |
| Authors: | Mietje Germonpré ,Mikhail V. Sablin,Viviane Despré s,Michael Hofreiter,Martina Lá zničková -Galetová ,Rhiannon E. Stevens,Mathias Stiller |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Palaeontology, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, 1000 Brussel, Belgium;2. Zoological Institute RAS, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia;3. Institut für Allgemeine Botanik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Müllerweg 6, D-55099 Mainz, Germany;4. Department of Biology (Area 2), The University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK;5. Anthropos Institute, Moravian Museum, Zelný trh 6, 65937 Brno, Czech Republic;6. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER, UK;g Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, 150 Biomedical Sciences Building, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | This is a response to the comments of Crockford and Kuzmin (2012) on our identification of Palaeolithic dogs from different European Palaeolithic sites. In their comments Crockford and Kuzmin (2012) present some errors, misunderstandings and misrepresentations that we remedy here. In our opinion, the early wolf domestication must be regarded as an intimate relationship between humans and canids including the breeding of the latter by prehistoric people, resulting in the European Palaeolithic dogs. |
| |
| Keywords: | Wolf domestication Palaeolithic dogs Aurignacian Gravettian Multivariate statistics Europe |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
