Living in anachronistic space: Temporalities of displacement in Moscow's Soviet-era standardised housing |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Washington State University, USA;2. Webster University, USA;1. Momentive & Laurier Institute for the Study of Public Opinion and Policy, Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada;2. University of Amsterdam, Netherlands;1. CEDEM – Centre for Ethnic and Migration Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Liège, Place des orateurs 3 (Quartier Agora), bât. 31, bte 24, 4000, Liège, Belgium;2. Center for Social & Cultural Psychology (CeSCuP), Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP 122 50 av. F.D, Roosevelt, B-1050, Bruxelles, Belgium |
| |
Abstract: | In 2017, the Moscow municipality announced the demolition of several thousand remaining Soviet-era, standardised apartments (khrushchevki). Known as the Renovation, the renewal project promises to replace the khrushchevki with new residential districts. Based on fieldwork in Northern Izmailovo, a district targeted for demolition, this article analyses encroaching displacement by foregrounding the temporal experiences of affected residents. Building on literature that explores the political underpinnings of discourse and aesthetics in urban renewal projects, with particular attention to Rancière's temporal politics, the article contends that the Renovation depends on the discursive construction of its targets as spatial anachronisms. This renders the Soviet-era housing blocks, and those who live within them, vulnerable to a spectrum of modernising aestheticising interventions—from minor ornamentation to wholesale demolition. Based on ethnographic data, the article shows how the initial stages of redevelopment have altered a local network of benches. For a group of long-standing, elderly residents, these disruptions have instigated more profound reckonings with their own sense of time in/and space, leading to an understanding that they, too, are seen as anachronistic features of the city. Paying attention to urban materiality on a granular scale, particularly in standardised housing estates, reveals the multifaceted temporalities that inform residents' engagements with the spaces of their home districts. The article argues that doing so counters the exclusionary temporal logic of the discourse of anachronism by denying its ubiquity. In turn, it speaks to growing geographic interest in amplifying alternative temporalities in the face of destructive, terminal change. |
| |
Keywords: | Demolition Renewal Postsocialist urbanism Displacement Rancière Anachronism Temporality Discourse Aesthetics Moscow Standardised housing Khrushchevka Renovation |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|