首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Ur- und Frühgeschichte
Authors:Mathias Wiegert
Abstract:During the past few years a history of special subjects and a history of science, being critical and historical as well as taking into account scientific theory and methodology, has established itself under the influence of philosophy in many domains of the sciences. Such a scientific history is now also required in the branch of the science of history. It demands the ability of re-evaluating historical sources and studies as well as the knowledge of the political aspect of a future scientific history. As a matter of fact a future scientific chronicle of prehistory has to examine not only the subject of historical research itself, but also its aim, method and the whole sociopolitical background. This is more important than a positivist study of individual and specific historical aspects, a thorough compilation of different approaches in historical research, scientists and institutions. It is also better than making an arbitrary selection of single biographies in order to have a political legitimation of the present state of research. Moreover, the danger of such a selection is the degradation of persons in history and the falsification of historical facts. Apart from a determination of the subject with regard to scientific and political aspects the search of historical clues as well as the re-evaluation of historical and archeological sources could both lead to a revision of prehistory.
Keywords:Deskriptive Forschungsgeschichte  Historiographie  Historisch-kritische Methode  Nationalsozialismus  Oral history  Paradigmata  Positivismus  Wissenschaftstheorie und Methodologie  Wissenschaftstradition  Wissenschaftswandel  XX Jh  
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号