首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Territorializing spatial data: Controlling land through One Map projects in Indonesia and Myanmar
Institution:1. Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Mulford Hall, 130 Hilgard Way, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA;2. Department of Global Development, 240 Warren Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA;3. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, 2424 Maile Way, University of Hawai''i, Manoa, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA;4. Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
Abstract:Once confined to paper, national cartographic projects increasingly play out through spatial data infrastructures such as software programs and smartphones. Across the Global South, foreign donor-funded digital platforms emphasize transparency, accountability and data sharing while echoing colonial projects that consolidated state-based territorial knowledge. This article brings political geography scholarship on state and counter-mapping together with new work on the political ecology of data to highlight a contemporary dimension of territorialization, one in which state actors seek to consolidate and authorize national geospatial information onto digital platforms. We call attention to the role of data infrastructures in contemporary resource control, arguing that territorializing data both extends state territorialization onto digital platforms and, paradoxically, provides new avenues for non-state actors to claim land. Drawing on interviews, document review, and long-term fieldwork, we compare the origins, institutionalization and realization of Indonesia and Myanmar's ‘One Map’ projects. Both projects aimed to create a government-managed online spatial data platform, building on national mapping and management traditions while responding to new international incentives, such as climate change mitigation in Indonesia and good democratic governance in Myanmar. While both projects encountered technical difficulties and evolved during implementation, different national histories and political trajectories resulted in the embrace and expansion of the program in Indonesia but reluctant participation and eventual crisis in Myanmar. Together, these cases show how spatial data infrastructures can both extend state control over space and offer opportunities for contesting or reimagining land and nation, even as such infrastructures remain embedded in local power relations.
Keywords:Territorialization  Data infrastructures  Political ecology  Critical cartography  Myanmar  Indonesia
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号