首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


U.S. anti-abortion ideology on the move: Mobile crisis pregnancy centers as unruly,unmappable, and ungovernable
Affiliation:1. Chellis House 56 Hillcrest Rd, Middlebury, VT, 05753, USA;2. Middlebury College, 14 Old Chapel Road, Middlebury, VT, 05753, USA;1. The Department of Geography, Downing Place, University of Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK;2. Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
Abstract:Crisis pregnancy centers—anti-abortion non-profits that masquerade as abortion clinics—are increasingly using mobile units to expand their geographical and political reach. In this article, the first to consider mobile crisis pregnancy centers, we examine the methodological, epistemological, and political challenges that mobile units raise for scholars and activists alike. The mobile nature of on-the-go crisis pregnancy centers makes them difficult to both map and regulate. Taking these challenges as a starting point, we reflect on what we learned from our failure to map mobile crisis pregnancy centers. We first outline how mobile crisis pregnancy centers—the epitome of the wild, ungovernable, and unruly—call into question the glorification of these concepts in feminist and queer studies. We also suggest that mobile crisis pregnancy centers trouble the possibility of thinking feminist and political geography separately, as well as the positive affects associated with mobility in discussions of reproductive mobilities. We close with a qualitative analysis of mobile crisis pregnancy centers’ online presence, examining the particular concerns that their mobility raises in terms of race, class, and place.
Keywords:Abortion  Anti-Abortion  Mobile crisis pregnancy centers  Queer studies  Feminist geography  Political geography  Mobility  Race  Rural  Urban  Class  Unmappable
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号