首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Grabbing the commons: Forest rights,capital and legal struggle in the Carpathian Mountains
Institution:1. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, USA;2. Family Forest Research Center, USA;3. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, USA;4. University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Environmental Conservation, USA;1. School of Social Sciences, The University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia;2. Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance, University of Canberra, Australia;3. Forest Action Nepal, Bagdole, Lalitpur, Nepal;4. School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5064, Australia;1. Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chittagong 4331, Bangladesh;2. Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, FI-02150, Finland
Abstract:In this paper we show that formalizing communal rights is a process riddled with struggles leading to a partial or total grabbing of commons. Drawing on long-term research and using interviews, surveys, and historical sources, we analyze struggles that emerged from processes of formalizing rights to commons, occurring one century apart in the Carpathian Mountains of Romania. The first wave of formalization, initiated by the state in 1910, institutionalized a model of hybrid commons in which individual rights to communal forests and pastures were understood as inheritable and tradable shares. This generated never-ending contention and a vulnerability to capital, allowing timber companies to grab shares and dispossess rightsholders. The second formalization, post-1989, enabled local communities to regain rights to forests that had been nationalized by the state at the beginning of the socialist rule. However, this resurgence of mountain commons unleashed again a suite of legal struggles, bringing back to life previous vulnerabilities and dispossessions. We argue that the formalization of rights often does not bring clarity and security to commons rightsholders. Instead, it creates a suite of vulnerabilities, ambiguities, and complexity within regulatory texts, begetting the grabbing of the commons.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号