首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

语言景观研究进展:地方主体的空间实践
引用本文:张蔼恒,孙九霞. 语言景观研究进展:地方主体的空间实践[J]. 人文地理, 2019, 34(4): 13-19. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.04.002
作者姓名:张蔼恒  孙九霞
作者单位:1. 广东外语外贸大学 外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心, 广州 510420;
2. 中山大学 旅游学院, 广州 510275;
3. 中山大学 旅游休闲与社会发展研究中心, 广州 510275
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41601146);国家社会科学基金重大项目(15ZDB118);广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划课题(2019GZYB46)
摘    要:本文以地方主体性理论为切入点梳理语言景观相关文献,以构建主体为分析框架,从“国家”、“私人机构”和“多元主体互动”三方面综述语言景观的研究。不同主体通过空间实践达到规训、表达、压迫和抵抗等目的,而语言景观则是这些实践的中介和结果。自上而下的语言政策表现为国家作为主体对地方的规训;反之,由个体作为构建主体的语言景观是主体表达自我和抵抗他者的实践。流动性较强的地方,多元主体通过语言景观互动构建地方性,其语言景观是资本、文化和权力多重力量作用下的实践过程和结果。过去语言学视角的研究只关注单主体的空间实践,未来采取跨学科研究可进一步探寻多主体互动过程与结果,更全面地发掘语言景观在地方构建中的作用以及构建的地方意义。

关 键 词:语言景观  地方性  空间实践  主体性  研究进展
收稿时间:2018-09-04

PROGRESS OF LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE FROM THE PROSPETIVE OF SPACE PRACTICE AND PLACE SUBJECTIVITY
ZHANG Ai-heng,SUN Jiu-xia. PROGRESS OF LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE FROM THE PROSPETIVE OF SPACE PRACTICE AND PLACE SUBJECTIVITY[J]. Human Geography, 2019, 34(4): 13-19. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.04.002
Authors:ZHANG Ai-heng  SUN Jiu-xia
Affiliation:1. Center for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China;
2. School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
3. Center for Tourism, Leisure and Social Development, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Abstract:Linguistic landscape attracts academic attentions as an inter-disciplines study object. The paper utilizes subjectivity of place theory to review linguistic landscape studies. Based on the analytical frame of constructive actors, the review generalizes the previous research into three categories according to the main actors in the process of building linguistic landscape, which are namely "state and government", "private sectors" and "interaction of multi-actors". Linguistic landscape takes place as both mediator and consequences of space practices, which varies according to different purposes of constructive actors. These purposes may be to discipline others, to represent own identity, to oppress others or to resist the authority. Top-down linguistic policy in linguistic landscape represents the disciplinary role of authority to the public. On the other hand, individual actors built multi-cultural linguistic landscapes representing variety of placeness. These actors express their own identity and resist otherness via the practice of constructing linguistic landscapes, which leads bottom-up direction of power in the constructing process.
Keywords:linguistic landscape  placeness  space practice  subjectivity  review  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《人文地理》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《人文地理》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号