首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Loggers,Development Agents and the Exercise of Power in Amazonia
Authors:Gabriel Medina  Benno Pokorny  Bruce Campbell
Institution:1. is a professor at the Federal University of Goiás, Brazil. He concluded his PhD at Albert‐Ludwigs University of Freiburg, Institute of Silviculture, in the scope of the ForLive Research Project. Information on his recent and forthcoming publications can be found at http://www.waldbau.uni‐freiburg.de/forlive/. He can be contacted at Av. Roberto Camelier, 1005, ap 703, 66033‐640, Belém, Pará, Brazil;2. e‐mail: gabriel.silva.medina@gmail.com.;3. is a professor at Albert‐Ludwigs University of Freiburg, Institute of Silviculture;4. e‐mail: benno.pokorn@waldbau.uni‐freiburg.de;5. is a professor at Charles Darwin University (Australia) and a researcher at the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) in Indonesia);6. he can be contacted at e‐mail: b.campbell@cgiar.org
Abstract:Many believe that Amazonian communities could benefit from the growing market for timber through self‐governed approaches to forest management. However, there is no clear understanding of how communities are to develop such approaches given logging frontiers that are characterized by informal negotiations with loggers and community forestry initiatives that are promoted by development agents. This article reports on research from four study areas in Bolivia, Brazil and Peru which reveals that external players exercise considerable power over communities. First, loggers and development agents impose forest management schemes directly on communities, hindering them from developing their own approaches. Second, paternalistic relationships with loggers and development agents prevent communities from identifying common interests and expressing these through their representative organizations. Finally, loggers and development agents use powerful discourses to shape acceptable schemes in forest management, silencing communities’ voices in debates. Through these different power mechanisms, external agents thwart the emergence of self‐governed community management approaches.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号