《尚书·尧典》缺文举例——兼谈卫宏《诏定古文尚书序》的可信性

本文举出了<尚书·尧典>中四处缺讹现象,并予以分析和辨正,解决了该篇中几处文句不能通读的问题,证明今文<尚书>二十八篇中确有由于口传造成的文字错误,同时证明卫宏<诏定古文尚书序>具有一定的可信性,不能全都否定.

Illustrations of the words missing in "Yao Anthority. The Book of History."

This paper thinks there are some words missing in "Yao Authority. The Book of History", and did remedy and reexplainations according to the ancient classical worke and unearth documents, partly read over the Sentences. Furthermone, this paper considers that Weihong's "The Foreword of the Book of History In classical writling" in Han dynasty Said that Fusheng was old and unclear enunciation. So the Condition of there were mang slips and omissions in "The Book of History by Lishu"tanght by him is trustworthy.