首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Between Large-N and Small-N Analyses: Historical Comparison of Thirty Insurgency Case Studies
Authors:Christopher Paul  Colin P. Clarke  Beth Grill  Terrance Savitsky
Affiliation:RAND Corporation
Abstract:Abstract

The authors study the 30 insurgencies occurring between 1978 and 2008 using four methods crossing the qualitative/quantitative divide. The four approaches are narrative, bivariate comparison, comparative qualitative analysis, and K-medoids clustering. The quantification of qualitative data allows the authors to compare more cases than they could “hold in their heads” under a traditional small-n qualitative approach, improving the quality of the overall narrative and helping to ensure that the quantitative analyses respected the nuance of the detailed case histories. Structured data-mining reduces the dimensionality of possible explanatory factors relative to the available observations to expose patterns in the data in ways more common in large-n studies. The four analytic approaches produced similar and mutually supporting findings, leading to robust conclusions.
Keywords:cluster analysis  comparative historical methods  insurgency  qualitative comparative analysis  narrative method
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号