关于《史记》的缺补问题

《史记》的缺补问题在学术界一直争论较大。这一疑案总的看有两大关键问题：一是《史记》的亡缺问题，二是《史记》的补窜问题。关于《史记》的亡缺，古今以来的学者有多种说法，归纳起来，主要有七种；《史记》的补窜问题较为复杂，所谓“补”，是指对《史记》缺亡的部分进行补写，附骥《史记》而行；“续”是指对《史记》以后的事件进行续写；“窜”是指其他文字窜入《史记》文本之中。补窜问题涉及到《史记》中的许多篇目，古今学者也进行了多方面的考辨。解决《史记》的缺补问题，对于搞清《史记》文本的本来面目具有重要意义。

The Study on the Hiatus and Supplement of Shiji

The hiatus and supplement of Shiji always have dispute in academic circles. There are two key questions of the doubtful case: the one is the hiatus of Shiji, and the other is the supplement of it. There were many statements with regard to the hiatus of Shiji over the past. The seven main viewpoints were as follows: The supplement of Shiji is very complicated, the supplement complemented the hiatus part of Shiji which is cling to it; the continuing part were written the events after Shiji; The other part were the wrong words taken in Shiji, The hiatus and supplement related many chapters of Shiji, and the scholars at all time had tests in many ways. There have importance to make clear the truth of Shiji after solving the hiatus and supplement problems of it.