首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


A Critique of Faunal Analysis; Inconsistency among Experts in Blind Tests
Institution:1. Cardiff School of History, Archaeology and Religion, Cardiff University, UK CF10 3EU;2. CONICET-CADIC. Av./ B. Houssay, 200, Ushuaia, 9410, Argentina;3. Dept. of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK, Y01 7EP;4. BioArCh, Biology S-Block, University of York, York, UK YO10 5DD;5. Museo Acatushún de Mamíferos y Aves Australes, Ushuaia, 9410, Argentina;6. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Puan, 470. Buenos Aires, 1406, Argentina;1. Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia;2. School of Life and Environment Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;3. Tropical Futures Institute, James Cook University, Singapore;4. RMB Aqua Pty Ltd, Perth, Australia
Abstract:Fish faunal specialists with doctoral degrees independently evaluated samples of fish bones, teeth, and scales from a coastal archaeological site in San Luis Obispo County, California (CA-SLO-165). The considerable variation in interpretation raises serious questions regarding the accuracy of reporting and the usefulness of the data generated. Little agreement at the species level, wide differences in the total numbers of specimens in a given taxon, apparently inaccurate identifications, placements of specimens in excessively specific or overly general categories were typical inconsistencies. Recommendations for minimizing problems include having faunal work done by a specialist with biological knowledge of the specific animal group, and geographic region, identifying the reference collection used in the evaluation, stipulation of the criteria used for distinguishing similar species, and the location of the storage facility for the sample. Second opinions should be solicited and unreviewed data appearing in the “grey literature” should not be cited. A vigorous review process, rather than the reader, should select for credible information.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号