首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

1997-1999年史学评论状况评析
引用本文:周祥森.1997-1999年史学评论状况评析[J].史学月刊,2001(2):104-111.
作者姓名:周祥森
作者单位:河南大学,<史学月刊>编辑部,河南,开封,475001
摘    要:统计资料表明,近年来史学评论及其理论研究越来越受到史学界的重视,出现了学术书评建设、学风与学术规范建设、世纪末中国史学回顾等史学评论热潮.但从整体来看,史学评论在数量上还远远低于专业学术文章,在质量上则参差不齐,相当一部分评论学术质量不高;在史学评论学科与理论建设方面,则存在着明显不利于自身发展的思想倾向.因此,当代中国的史学评论尚不能真正实践其矫正史学发展方向和规范史学活动的学科目标,史学评论理论建设和学科建设依然任重而道远.

关 键 词:中国当代史学  史学评论  学术书评  学风  学术规范
文章编号:0583-0214(2001)02-0104-08
修稿时间:2000年12月31

A Critique on Historiograthy Reviews(1997-1999)
ZHOU Xiang-sen.A Critique on Historiograthy Reviews(1997-1999)[J].Journal of Historical Science,2001(2):104-111.
Authors:ZHOU Xiang-sen
Abstract:Historiography review and it's theoritical study has been receiving more and more attention in recent years,a historiography review boom arises on such issues: the building up of academic book review, academic atomosphere and norm, and looking back to China's historiography in the Century's end. But viewing from the whole,it is recognizable that the historiography reviews are less than academic essays in special fields in quantity and various in quality,among them quite a great number of low quality. Moreover,there appears a visible mental inclination unfavour to it's own development in the building up of historiography review branch theory. Therefore, contemporany China's historiography reviews still can not practically correct the direction of historiography development and standardize the aim of history researches, there remains a long way to go for the building up of historiography review theory and discipline.
Keywords:China's contemporary historiography  historiography reviews  academical book review  academic atomosphere  academic norm
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号