The use and abuse of paradigms in the history of political thought |
| |
Authors: | Mark Francis |
| |
Institution: | A Senior Lecturer in the Department of Political Science , University of Canterbury , Christ‐church, New Zealand |
| |
Abstract: | A paradigm is a methodological device which historians of political thought borrow from the history of science. The initial part of this article examines the views of three distinguished historians of political thought—Sheldon Wolin, Alan Ryan and John Pocock—who have borrowed paradigms. Wolin and Ryan are shown to have confused paradigms with weltanschauungen in such a way as to make the former less useful as methodological devices. Pocock, on the other hand, has been successful in his use of paradigms, though he does not sufficiently recognise their methodological limits. He also raises a conceptual problem. The latter part of this article examines the recent history of science in an attempt to clarify the use of paradigms and their limits. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|