The Politics of Executive Nominations in the Post-Nuclear Senate |
| |
Authors: | Ian Ostrander |
| |
Institution: | Department of Political Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan |
| |
Abstract: | In response to an ever more inefficient, intrusive, partisan, and plodding executive nominations process, a variety of increasingly potent reform measures have been recently enacted within Congress. The solutions have ranged from cutting the number of appointments requiring Senate confirmation to reducing the power of the filibuster on most nominations. Although these reforms may speed the nominations process, they may also influence the balance of power between Congress and the presidency by allowing more unilateral and unrestricted appointments. Is Congress conceding confirmation for expediency? In this investigation, I explore recent reforms with respect to the speed and outcomes of the executive nominations process as well as the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|