Honoring Ambiguity/Problematizing Certitude |
| |
Authors: | Joan M. Gero |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Anthropology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA |
| |
Abstract: | In this paper I argue that the practice of archaeology over-emphasizes and over-rewards unambiguous certainty in our interpretations, even though our conclusions are usually drawn from necessarily partial, underdetermined and complex evidence. I argue that full or partial erasure of ambiguity from our data and from our interpretive assertions does not serve the long-term interests of the discipline; that a feminist practice aimed at more nuanced understandings of the past and open to more subtle, multivalenced notions of reality, must accept ambiguity as a central feature of archaeological interpretation. After I review familiar strategies that are used to obscure troubling areas of uncertainty in archaeology, I urge feminist practice to resist employing these “mechanisms of closure” in our work. It is only by openly recognizing and preserving the ambiguity that resides in messy data arrangements today that we stand any hope of fuller and richer understandings in the future. |
| |
Keywords: | Feminist practice Theory Epistemology Ambiguity |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|