The historical narrative of the Wanli Korean campaign in the Qing Official Ming History

Abstract

The Ming History (明史 Mingshi) by Qing official historians took more than 90 years to complete, and Wan Sitong's 萬斯同 Draft Ming History (明史稿 Mingshi gao), Wang Hongxu's 王鴻緒 Draft Ming History, and the Ming History palace edition overseen by Zhang Tingyu 張廷玉 were the most important histories of the Ming over its different stages of compilation. Wan Sitong gave much attention to the writing of history in the biographies from the Wanli Korea Campaign, Wang Hongxu did not give them much attention, and Zhang Tingyu repudiated and even negated them. In Zhang Tingyu's Ming History, the Annals of Shenzong (神宗本紀 Shenzong benji) set the tone of repudiating the Korea campaign. Due to their clan, the Bozhou Campaign (播州之役 Bozhou zhiyi), or the Liaodong Incident (遼東事變 Liaodong shibian), nearly none of the Ming generals from the eastern expedition to Korea were given biographies due to their participation in the Korean War. The History of the Choson (朝鮮傳 Chaoxian zhuan) gives a negative evaluation that denies or undervalues relevant people and battles. On the one hand, this was due to the influence of historical sources. Due to Yang Gao’s 楊鎬 responsibility for defeat in the Battle of Saerhu 薩 爾 滸 之 役, the compilers of the Veritable Records of Ming Shenzong (明神宗實錄 Ming Shenzong shilu) followed the account of Ding Yingtai 丁應泰 in their records and denied the accomplishments of Yang Gao and the Ming army in Korea. On the other hand, due to real political needs, as the commanders of the eastern expedition to Korea later became the military rival of the Later Jin in Liaodong, an attitude of denial had to be adopted against them to create legitimacy for the Qing dynasty. These were the two main factors that determined the way in which the Qing official Ming History wrote the history of the Wanli Korean War.     

论明万历中后期言官对神宗的批判

明万历中后期,以言官为首的官僚集团兴起了一股批判明神宗的风潮。其根本缘由,首先是神宗君德严重缺失,其次在于言官勇于以道事君。在深层次上,这种批判也是该时期政局危殆、皇权变异并衰落以及士风日下、部分言官沽名钓誉等社会变动综合作用的结果。尽管这种批判并未摆脱传统的“尊君—罪君”的政治评判模式,但它是明清之际启蒙思想的先导和重要的思想资源。     

高拱《病榻遗言》考论——与赵毅教授商榷

赵毅教授撰文提出,张居正倒台原因中包含高拱权谋"因素",此说值得商榷。本文认为:《病榻遗言》刊刻问世于万历三十年至三十一年之间,不在万历十年至十二年之间,故与张居正身后罹难无涉;该书是高拱对隆庆六年正月至万历元年二月之间发生的诸多政治事件的真实记录,并非不实之词;该书是当事人记述的回忆录,绝不是"为其身后报复政敌"的所谓"政治权谋"、"巧妙政治设计",因而不可能影响到万历十年以后的明代政局。     

高拱著作版本考辨

现存高拱著作十五种,明清时期刊刻过三次：即初刻四十二册本、万历《高文襄公集》四十四卷本和笼春堂《高文襄公文集》八十八卷本。本文对这三个刻本所收书目、编订原则、卷数差别和内容异同等问题作了较为详细的辨析考证。这不仅对我们重新编订校勘《高拱全集》至关重要,而且对研究明史及高拱的政治改革和学术思想也有着重要意义。     

明代徽州木商经营实态——《万历郑氏合同分单账簿》研究

《万历郑氏合同分单账簿》为祁门奇峰郑氏木商经营的合同、分单、账簿的汇编,时间跨度大,内容丰富。账簿记载了郑氏木商历年木材砍伐的利润分配、股份形态,详细反映了徽商的经营实态,多层次、多分支的股份关系值得关注。账簿还揭示了商业经营与地方社会中宗族内部成员、异姓宗族之间的互动关系,也折射出了商业发展与社会变迁的历程。     

明中后期的史学思潮

嘉靖、万历以来 ,时代的动荡 ,政治、经济、思想上的巨大变化 ,阳明心学和此后实学思潮的兴起都对史学产生了深远的影响 ,批判程朱理学成为一种思潮 ,传统的经史关系认识受到冲击 ,以史经世的思潮得到发展。