排序方式: 共有7条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Prasenjit Duara 《Development and change》1998,29(4):647-670
Transnationalism tends to be seen as a late twentieth century development associated with advanced capitalism, flexible production and post-modernism. However, if, as many claim, nationalism emerged in the era of capitalism, then it surely had to deal with the boundary-crossing and globalizing impetus of capitalism from its inception. This article explores how nationalist regimes and spokesmen dealt with the transnational flows, demands, and ideals generated not only by capitalism, but by historical forces such as universalizing religions and the distribution and movement of populations across territorial nations. Focusing on East Asia in the first half of the twentieth century, three cases are studied: the convergence of Chinese and Japanese ideals of pan-Asianism; the Chinese republican regime's effort to incorporate the non-Chinese peoples of the vast peripheries into the territorial nation-state; and this regime's efforts to cultivate the loyalty of overseas Chinese to the nation-state. Mobilizing and deploying these transterritorial phenomena was crucial to the nation-state's internal power, yet such a mobilization tended to transgress the conception of territorial sovereignty upon which the nation-state was equally dependent both domestically and internationally. The recent signs of a tendency for the territorially sovereign nation to develop into a deterritorialized nation has consequences that can only be understood in the context of the nation's relationship to transnational forces in this earlier period. 相似文献
2.
3.
Prasenjit Duara 《Frontiers of History in China》2011,6(2):285-295
The paper seeks to grasp the conditions under which the idea of the multi-national state developed in twentieth-century China.
Although the idea of multiple nationalities was taking hold at the beginning of the twentieth-century in Europe—especially
in Eastern Europe, it first found institutional expression in the Chinese Republic declared in 1912. While the grounds for
the emergence have to do with the transition from empire to nation-state in many countries of the world, the idea in China
also drew from imperial Chinese conceptions of an imperial federation. Moreover, the impact of the multi-national state in
China was long-term and we can find an important dynamic of Chinese politics in this formation. 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
The Regime of Authenticity: Timelessness, Gender, and National History inModern China 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Prasenjit Duara 《History and theory》1998,37(3):287-308
7.
1