Familia Sancti Martini: Domus ecclesiae on earth as it is in heaven

In the post-imperial world of sixth-century Gaul, the Church found itself competing for allegiance with strengthened local family groupings as well as royal households. In this milieu the fragmentation of power and the propensity for spoliation of church lands posed a severe problem for ecclesiastical survival. An answer might be found in a competing kindred structure: the family of the saint. Such an entity would have the benefit of building a support group for the Church that could cut across the existing family lines and thereby weaken their impact. As a voluntary association based on the celestial it would have the added benefit of being a familia everlasting, and endlessly elastic.The works of Gregory of Tours contain such an idea built around his patronus, St Martin. Gregory's preface to Book 5 of his History, and his frequent pleas against feuding, show his concern as to how the familia Sancti Martini could perform an annealing function for society, mitigate the more rebarbative elements of the feud, and leave the Church in a strengthened position in society.     

The President and the Environment: A Reinterpretation of Neustadt's Theory of Presidential Leadership

Neustadt's theory of presidential leadership is conventionally viewed as based on a model of the Bargaining President, in which presidents focus on twisting arms and trading favors rather than on making public appeals. However, Neustadt's theory has a deeper logic—the logic of strategic choice, in which both effective bargaining and rhetorical appeals are techniques of presidential persuasion enabled by a President's choices. This reinterpretation of Neustadt's theory is supported by an original case study of President George H.W. Bush's leadership on the 1990 Clean Air Act. The President presented an initiative in a manner that capitalized on the public mood and he made key strategic choices aimed at persuading congressional leaders to engage with his administration in a non-zero sum game to enact a law that served their mutual policy and political interests. Rhetorical appeals were few in number. Quid pro quo bargaining played a limited role.     

James Madison,Justice Scalia,and Constitutional Interpretation

James Madison (1751–1836), so-called “Father of the Constitution,” held consistently throughout his long public career to a version of textualism regarding constitutional interpretation. It is surprising that for the author of the authoritative notes of the Federal Convention, Madison downplayed altogether the original intent of the constitutional Framers. From 1796 until his death Madison insisted that if constitutional meaning was to be searched for outside the text, the relevant sources to consult were ratifying conventions of the states, and “other public indications” at the time of ratification. In today's parlance Madison adopted a “fair-meaning textualism” method of constitutional interpretation and rejected the “original intent” jurisprudence favored by some modern-day commentators. This textualism appears to have been the method followed by the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Madison also believed in a living Constitution–one that had life and validity breathed into it by the ratifiers, and hence the people, not by its Framers.