排序方式: 共有37条查询结果,搜索用时 296 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
While political scientists and legal academics have both evinced a “fascination with disagreement on courts,” 1 this scholarly concentration on conflict rather than consensus has tended to focus on dissent and dissenting opinions. As far as we can tell, there is no authoritative history of concurring opinions in the U.S. Supreme Court. This article is a first effort to correct that oversight by examining developments and change in concurring behavior from the founding through the White Court (1921). This period covers the emergence of an institutionally independent national judicial branch and ends before the start of the modern, policy‐making Court era, which we argue begins with the Taft Court and the creation of a fully discretionary docket. 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.