SEISMIC PROTECTION OF LIGHT SECONDARY SYSTEMS THROUGH DIFFERENT BASE ISOLATION SYSTEMS

The objective of the present work is to examine advantages and drawbacks of different types of isolation systems, when seismic isolation is used as a protection strategy against damage to internal equipment and contents. The starting point of the study is the big experimental program of table tests on reduced-scale R/C structural models, carried out within the MANSIDE (Memory Alloys for New Seismic Isolation DEvices) project. Seven identical l:3.3-scaled, 3-storey frames were tested, including two fixed-base models and four base-isolated models with different isolation systems, namely: (1) rubber isolators, (2) steel-hysteretic system and (3), re-centring SMA (Shape Memory Alloy) system. In this study the internal equipment is regarded as an elastic single degree of freedom, with 2% equivalent viscous damping. Therefore, the capability of fixed-base and base-isolated models with different isolation systems to protect light secondary systems is evaluated by comparing the floor response spectra obtained from the storey accelerations recorded during shaking table tests. Three different PGA's are considered, about 0.15g, 0.3g and 0.5g, respectively. All the shaking table tests are also simulated with an accurate numerical model, to validate and better understand the experimental results. It is found that each type of isolation system reduces considerably the seismic effects on internal equipments in wide frequency regions. However, tuning effects may arise in specific frequency ranges, corresponding to the first mode in structures equipped with quasi-elastic (rubber) isolation systems, and to higher modes in structures equipped with elasto-plastic (steel) and nonlinear re-centering (SMA) isolation systems.     

EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF R/C FRAMES RETROFITTED WITH DISSIPATING AND RE-CENTRING BRACES

An extensive program of shaking table tests on 1/4-scale three-dimensional R/C frames was jointly carried out by the Department of Structure, Soil Mechanics and Engineering Geology (DiSGG) of the University of Basilicata, Italy, and the National Laboratory of Civil Engineering (LNEC), Portugal. It was aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of passive control bracing systems for the seismic retrofit of R/C frames designed for gravity loads only. Two different types of braces were considered, one based on the hysteretic behaviour of steel elements, the other on the superelastic properties of Shape Memory Alloys (SMA). Different protection strategies were pursued, in order to fully exploit the high energy dissipation capacity of steel-based devices, on one hand, and the supple-mental re-centring capacity of SMA-based devices, on the other hand. The experimental results confirmed the great potentials of both strategies and of the associated devices in limiting structural damage. The retrofitted model was subjected to table accelerations as high as three times the acceleration leading the unprotected model to collapse, with no significant damage to structural elements. Moreover, the re-centring capability of the SMA-based bracing system was able to recover the undeformed shape of the frame, when it was in a near-collapse condition. In this paper the experimental behaviour of the non protected and of the protected structural models are described and compared.